The Perth Group
set Andrew Maniotis straight on DNA recombination which he thinks is Christl
Meyer's novel insight
From:
Valendar Turner
Sent: 30 July 2012
To: Andy Maniotis
Andrew,
Back in 1988
the principle of DNA recombinations was postulated in a series of published
papers and the importance of redox in the process theorised.
Refs.
1. E
Papadopulos-Eleopulos. Reappraisal of AIDS. Is the oxidation induced by the
risk factors the primary cause? Med. Hypoth. 1988;25:151-162.
2. E
Papadopulos-Eleopulos, VF Turner, JM Papadimitriou, D Causer. The isolation of
HIV: has it really been achieved? The case against Continuum (Supplement).
1996;4:1-24.
Eleni, Val &
John
On
10/07/2012, Andy Maniotis wrote:
Dear Emanuel, and Dr. Meyer,
I thank you kindly, Emanuel, and most respectfully, Dr. Meyer, for directing me
to Dr. Meyer’s stunningly succinct and enlightening interview. I will be eagerly
looking for your work, Christl, in which you identify those immune
cell-combinatorial genes that account for “HIV-positive testing results. I had
suspected years ago that such immune combinatorial genes might account for the
stereotypic readings read by reference labs throughout the world on ELISAs,
WB’s, and PCRs, and could account for the so-called “retroid” (HERV, ERV,
“genetic fossil”) literature as well, but I only had surmise and no proof until
learning of your claims you present in this brief interview:
http://mitrinchera.obolog.com/aids-is-hoax-biologist-christl-meyer-explodes-the-hiv-aids-conspiracy-1998383
Also Dr. Meyer, I am eager to look at your website (christl-meyer-science.net)
and study it for the clues you have discovered regarding the identity and nature
of these immune cell-generated recombinatorial genes and their products, if you
have some information about these topics on your website?
In the past, we’ve only been able to speculate about these previously and
tentatively named “retroids” as having their origin from immune cell
recombinatorial gene cassettes, and therefore your finding is most welcome,
timely, insightful, and powerful in this context. Although rational surmise
alone should have made us “denialists” more vigilant to seek these endogenous
sequences out in immune-specific gene databases as I surmise you
have done already. For example, the closest hypothesis to an immune cell origin
of these sequences and their products was once articulated a few years ago as
follows, so please correct and help us improve upon this specific line of
reasoning and choice of words as you see fit (from an interview that can be
found in its entirety here:
http://aras.ab.ca/articles/scientific/20071007-Maniotis-Lambros.pdf).
Here is the relevant section in this interview:
“Most importantly, the nature and plasticity of potentially stereotypic signals
of especially the immune cell!s or cancer cell!s genomes under various stressful
and even normal states are not yet known. Despite “AIDS establishment” claims
(e.g. Robert Gallo) that, the whole Human genome has been sequenced and is
known, and that “HIV’s” molecular signature isn’t found in the normal human
genome, or in even in stadiums full of “HIV-negative” people, the nature of some
immune cells is their unique ability to re-arrange their genomes to produce
antibodies to new agents, and this mechanism is not understood.”
“Therefore, all possible or even stereotypic re-arrangements of the genomes of
immune cells is not yet sequenced, because, these rearrangements have not yet
occurred, because the antigens that will evoke them have not yet plagued
Mankind yet, or, more likely, such novel sequences may only be assembled or
evoked in immune cells when certain stresses are placed on the individual.”
“Presumably, the Human Genome project didn’t sequence these individual’s
genomes, or indeed the Human genome that is in every subgroup of Human beings.
Only “representative” genomes have been sequenced: not every individual’s who
lives in the Human population. And we have no idea regarding what most of these
so-called genes do, or how they function.”
Finally, I must congratulate you for emphasizing the so-called the continuing
genocide of the “HIV” vaccine issues and the non-utility of this archery
battalion of poisoned arrows as an ultimate proof of the non- existence of “HIV”
, as I have tried to do on several occasions in the past. Much more about these
fraudulent genocidal jab campaigns on my website is detailed in case you are
interested in how Fauci lies by manipulating numbers to tout the efficacy of the
recently “futile” and halted Military-Thailand Trial, the 100 failed and often
abruptly halted “HIV” vaccine trials, and the 220 current duds that are now
recruiting or just completed that are currently in that “HIV” vaccine
“pipeline,” in order to justify his 500M/year budget specifically slated for the
criminal vaccine makers.
Please see my website for more information specifically regarding these
vaccines, and their significance regarding the non-existence of “HIV,” and again
I thank you both Emanuel, and Dr. Meyer, for enlightening me as to this exciting
new finding about the immune cell origin of the virus that never existed (and
still doesn’t according to a new EM study we are about to publish).
My website can be found here:
andrewmaniotis.wordpress.com