Title: Transcripts Crowe suppressed of the Perth Group's evidence in the Parenzee case
Post by: Rod Knoll, blogger on May 18, 2010, 02:04:18 AM
Anthony Brink of TIG has made available transcripts of the Perth Group's evidence in the Parenzee case, which Crowe refused to buy at their request with the money Jim Wolfe gave him specifically to support them.
Please note the following corrections to errors in the transcripts which the Perth Group pointed out in their email exchange with Crowe (http://www.tig.org.za/DavidCroweApril-7-2009.pdf) following his fatal interference in the case:
"At the end of the evidence given by the “HIV” experts, the DPP noted that there were many mistakes in the transcripts and asked for permission to correct them. We were never asked to correct them, and judging from the EPE evidence quoted by the DPP and the Judge, it appears neither has anybody else. Mistakes appear to be especially frequent in EPE’s evidence, so much so that the meaning is lost or seems to appear to be the opposite to what was intended. For example (three of the significant mistakes are underlined):
“A. I’m not interested in what she [Padian] says. I’m not interested in her data [EPE testified it was only Padian’s data, not her interpretation, that interested her]. And her evidence does not prove heterosexual transmission, no matter how you take it. It is not what she says in AIDSTruth. It is not what she says in published scientific work, and for published scientific work let me tell you in her prospective studies she has over 170, or 173 I think, or five, individuals, men who are positive and their negative partners, and women who are positive and their negative partners. In the average, they live up to 60 years, and even at the end of the study, when the study started, the one I think, only 33% of people who are using condoms. And at the end of the study, 25% who were still not using consistently condoms, and no-one, no-one of these couples become positive. How can I say that the Padian paper proves heterosexual transmission? How she can say that her studies prove heterosexual transmission, more importantly?” Among the many mistakes, the most significant are: There should be no not in the second and fifth sentences. And 60 should read 6."
Also, there is new evidence recently made public which shows David Crowe's interference in the Parenzee trial. Go to TIG's "RA" page (http://www.tig.org.za/RA.htm) and scroll down the page until the paragraph that starts:
"Here’s the ‘cross-examination text’ that Crowe falsely denied having written"
We suggest that you read everything in that paragraph.
In addition, we recommend that you read everything at the following link:
There is a new document on Crowe's interference in the Parenzee case at the link above.
The transcripts are AT THIS LINK (http://www.tig.org.za/Transcript_Perth_Group_evidence.htm).
(click here to view a list of all discussions (http://www.tig.org.za/index.php?board=1.0))