AIDS Dissidents Exposed Blog
July 28, 2016, 08:13:56 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: Attention all first-time visitors: YOU DO NOT HAVE TO REGISTER OR JOIN THIS FORUM IN ORDER TO READ ALL CONTENT THAT IS POSTED HERE. Please ignore all links asking you to login or register and click on THIS LINK for important information.

"We have to fight science with science. And, unlike the opposition, we have to be 100% scientifically accurate with every single word we write if we want to be believed. Being right is only 3% of the answer and the remaining 97% is politics. But without the 3% the race doesn't start...."

(e-mail from the Perth Group to fellow dissidents, 3 December, 2008)
  Home Help Search Login Register  
  Show Posts
Pages: 1 [2] 3
16  AIDS Dissidents Exposed Blog / AIDS Dissidents Exposed Blog / Re:*NEW*-RA's latest disaster-in-the-making on: October 12, 2010, 07:17:05 AM
In addition, it is my understanding that, after enduring the stupidity and the debacle of the Parenzee case, the Perth Group has decided (quite justifiably, in my opinion) to refuse to get involved in any court case in which Anthony Brink is not also involved. The Perth Group has obviously sensed trouble in attorney Steele's approach in the Zapata case and Brink has, too. Stay tuned for more insight into this terribly flawed case...

17  AIDS Dissidents Exposed Blog / AIDS Dissidents Exposed Blog / Another one bites the dust.... on: October 12, 2010, 12:37:53 AM
Please read THIS NOTE from the Perth Group concerning the Zapata AZT wrongful death case.

Anthony Brink will soon follow with his "analysis of the incredibly ineptly drawn complaint by Duesberg’s and Leppo’s attorney, and why it’s doomed". For more information, go to and search for the following text: "A note from the Perth Group concerning the Zapata AZT wrongful death case..."

I also want to point out the fact that, in THEIR NOTE on the Zapata case, the Perth Group has graciously apologized for what they call their "inadvertent interference" in this case when, actually, their only so-called "interference" was merely replying to an e-mail which was sent to them by the lead attorney in the case.

It would be nice if David Crowe were to "man up" and apologize for his blatant and undeniably destructive interference in the Parenzee case.
18  AIDS Dissidents Exposed Blog / AIDS Dissidents Exposed Blog / Re: Recent important analysis from the Perth Group asks a crucial guestion on: September 17, 2010, 01:45:58 PM
Every so often, I've noticed that dissidents grow excited by the possibility that people might start "asking questions" again about "HIV/AIDS". I am dismayed to know that even some members and fellow supporters of the Perth Group have fallen into similar excitement over a recent cinematic venture that is being touted as a boon to the dissident cause. However, these types of developments are nothing new! We dissidents HAVE managed to get people to "ask questions" MANY times in the past! Those who have a personal interest (i.e., those who've tested "positive") will MOST LIKELY ask questions after encountering the dissident perspectives for the first time. The problem is NOT in getting people to ask questions. The problem for dissidents is how we ANSWER those questions.

The one constant that has remained throughout the years, during times when the general public has had both high and low levels of interest in the dissident movement, has been the fact that Peter Duesberg and his incessant acolytes (like the moronic David Crowe) have been the prominent faction of dissidents. As one can see in the message above, the Perth Group definitely keep fighting, and that is certainly inspiring. Unfortunately, as long as Duesberg and his fellow "HIV is a harmless virus" advocates remain in the dissident movement, the movement remains woefully unprepared to accurately answer all those questions that people might start asking.

For updated information, SEE:

(click here to view a list of all discussions)
19  AIDS Dissidents Exposed Blog / AIDS Dissidents Exposed Blog / Re: *NEW!*Peter Duesberg: Hero or hypocrite? and "Nessie's" Henry: Bauer the bumbler on: September 15, 2010, 06:50:40 AM
Conservative homophobe and Loch Ness monster believer Henry Bauer has acquired a habit of publishing papers in which he displays a complete disregard for science and ethics.

Go to:


A link to another article of interest can be found at THIS LINK.

Also, Bauer had really helped to promote the assertions made by Tony Lance, who became famous within the dissident movement (and infamous outside the movement) during his dissident "career" by proposing and promoting a theory about anal intercourse in which he provided a rather selective look at the data on this topic. However, Tony Lance began taking the "anti-HIV" drugs-apparently for the first time-several months ago after experiencing "more than a year of significant health challenges". I haven't been able to determine if Bauer still holds Lance and his ideas on anal sex in high esteem or not. For more information, see:

The content at that link is updated frequently, so feel free to check that link often.



20  AIDS Dissidents Exposed Blog / AIDS Dissidents Exposed Blog / *UPDATED/NEW* -The Vienna dissident "conference": "It's deja vu all over again" on: September 14, 2010, 04:15:24 PM


21  AIDS Dissidents Exposed Blog / AIDS Dissidents Exposed Blog / Re: *UPDATED/NEW* material: RA Grand poobah and habitual LIAR David Crowe is SUED on: September 14, 2010, 03:56:01 PM
There are affidavits from this current case which provide more insights into Crowe's behavior. Go to

And scroll down to (or search for) the text that reads "Crowe has a go at blackmail, with lies, to extort the withdrawal of litigation against him..."

22  AIDS Dissidents Exposed Blog / AIDS Dissidents Exposed Blog / Recent important analysis from the Perth Group asks a crucial guestion on: July 26, 2010, 06:59:35 PM
The Perth Group have issued their latest salvo, and it is a significant blow to RA/Duesberg and all the other factions of the dissident movement.

Go to:

23  AIDS Dissidents Exposed Blog / AIDS Dissidents Exposed Blog / Fiala's FOLLY: The Vienna "conference"- "Deja vu all over again"? on: July 08, 2010, 11:15:00 AM
You may have heard that, on the heels of their wildly successful (NOT!) seaside conference in November, 2009 in Peter Duesberg's backyard, the clowns at Rethinking AIDS held yet another dissident "conference" on 16-18 July, 2010 in Vienna, Austria, and it was timed purportedly in an effort to "counter" the orthodox AIDS Conference that took place there.

I am reminded of a popular definition for the word insanity:

"Repeating the same steps and expecting a different outcome."

The conference in 2009 got no major press or media coverage, or David Crowe certainly would have crowed about it. Of course, hindsight has also shown that no significant progress for the dissident cause was achieved as a result of that event. In addition, the 2009 event in Oakland "stretched (RA) to" its "financial limits", according to Crowe himself.

So far, the outcome after this latest conference seems to be the same as that garnered by the previous conference. Through their short-sighted planning, the event's organizers have pretty much guaranteed a fizzle similar to the one last year's conference received...

For important insights into the science that was discussed at the Vienna conference, please see: THIS COMPREHENSIVE ARTICLE. Also, Anthony Brink has written "open letters to RA board/group member Christian Fiala on science and politics and his dissident conference in Vienna, July 2010". Go to:

And scroll down to (or search for) the text that begins "Brink’s open letters to RA board/group member Christian Fiala..."
24  AIDS Dissidents Exposed Blog / AIDS Dissidents Exposed Blog / Transcripts Crowe suppressed of the Perth Group's evidence in the Parenzee case on: May 18, 2010, 02:04:18 AM
Anthony Brink of TIG has made available transcripts of the Perth Group's evidence in the Parenzee case, which Crowe refused to buy at their request with the money Jim Wolfe gave him specifically to support them.

Please note the following corrections to errors in the transcripts which the Perth Group pointed out in their email exchange with Crowe following his fatal interference in the case:

"At the end of the evidence given by the “HIV” experts, the DPP noted that there were many mistakes in the transcripts and asked for permission to correct them. We were never asked to correct them, and judging from the EPE evidence quoted by the DPP and the Judge, it appears neither has anybody else. Mistakes appear to be especially frequent in EPE’s evidence, so much so that the meaning is lost or seems to appear to be the opposite to what was intended. For example (three of the significant mistakes are underlined):

“A. I’m not interested in what she [Padian] says. I’m not interested in her data [EPE testified it was only Padian’s data, not her interpretation, that interested her]. And her evidence does not prove heterosexual transmission, no matter how you take it. It is not what she says in AIDSTruth. It is not what she says in published scientific work, and for published scientific work let me tell you in her prospective studies she has over 170, or 173 I think, or five, individuals, men who are positive and their negative partners, and women who are positive and their negative partners. In the average, they live up to 60 years, and even at the end of the study, when the study started, the one I think, only 33% of people who are using condoms. And at the end of the study, 25% who were still not using consistently condoms, and no-one, no-one of these couples become positive. How can I say that the Padian paper proves heterosexual transmission? How she can say that her studies prove heterosexual transmission, more importantly?” Among the many mistakes, the most significant are: There should be no not in the second and fifth sentences. And 60 should read 6."

Also, there is new evidence recently made public which shows David Crowe's interference in the Parenzee trial. Go to TIG's "RA" page and scroll down the page until the paragraph that starts:

"Here’s the ‘cross-examination text’ that Crowe falsely denied having written"

We suggest that you read everything in that paragraph.

In addition, we recommend that you read everything at the following link:

There is a new document on Crowe's interference in the Parenzee case at the link above.

The transcripts are AT THIS LINK.



25  AIDS Dissidents Exposed Blog / AIDS Dissidents Exposed Blog / Re: HOME PAGE of the "Rethinking AIDS" Exposed Forum (page continuously updated) on: April 17, 2010, 09:31:07 PM
 This message's contents have been transferred to the above message (CLICK HERE)

26  AIDS Dissidents Exposed Blog / AIDS Dissidents Exposed Blog / Duesberg & Bauer: hypocrisy, obfuscation, scientific theft and... oh yeah NESSIE on: April 16, 2010, 02:48:24 AM
In what is now a familiar pattern with her, diehard Duesberg dittohead Celia Farber, writing on 14 April 2010 in yet another blog post which has since been deleted, attempted to gain sympathy for Peter Duesberg by revealing that, apparently since November of 2009, Duesberg has been "under investigation" by the University of California at Berkeley for alleged, potential "misconduct" surrounding a paper he and fellow "HIV is a passenger virus" theorists submitted to the Journal Medical Hypotheses. Duesberg et al.'s paper was subsequently withdrawn, ostensibly because “prominent AIDS researchers” had contacted the Journal's publisher Elsevier and demanded the paper’s withdrawal, purportedly under the pretext that the paper ‘could potentially be damaging to global public health.’

Trying to drum up support for himself, Duesberg wrote on a third-party blog on 12th April: "Yes, the allegations are that 'the ideas (expressed in the now withdrawn Medical Hypotheses paper) are false, … un-supported by evidence, and dangerous'" and then he belly-ached that he had "not received evidence from UCB or elsewhere to support these allegations." This is a blatant LIE. Duesberg had INDEED received evidence which supports the notion that his ideas expressed in his withdrawn Medical Hypotheses paper are "unsupported by evidence", but such evidence was presented to him BY A FELLOW DISSIDENT.

In this analysis, which Duesberg ACKNOWLEDGED he's seen, a Perth Group supporter had pointed up the defects of Duesberg et al.'s criticism of the Chigwedere et al paper. Duesberg circulated this rebuttal nominally drawn by a third party. However, as Anthony Brink pointed out months ago,  this rebuttal seems clearly co-written by discredited Rethinking AIDS Grand poobah and eternal dipshit David Crowe: "it's marked all over with his characteristically vapid style of verbose argumentation, his favorite limp turns of phrase, his anodyne rhetorical tricks and generally his fingerprint stupidity and dishonesty". Jensen responded by asking Duesberg some questions which, as usual went unanswered. Duesberg, the eternal hypocrite and CHICKEN SHIT, seems to have a habit of developing hearing problems whenever asked hard questions. Instead of addressing the issues that Jensen raised, Duesberg challenged Jensen to write his own critique of the Chigwedere et al. paper, and Jensen obliged here.

Suffice it to say, Duesberg possesses a profound level of chutzpah. For years, he has hypocritically exhibited precisely the same behavior in his dealings with (or lack thereof) the Perth Group that he is constantly lamenting with respect to the AIDS industry's dealings (or lack thereof) with him. Last year, Duesberg's partisans in the Rethinking AIDS group, the two dipshit Davids- Dipshit David #1: RA Grand poobah David Crowe, and Dipshit David #2: Rasnick, one of Duesberg's co-authors of the withdrawn paper- both conspired to keep the issue of the lack of proof of "HIV" off the agenda for their "RA 2009" conference which proved to be a huge FLOP. Any literate, astute AIDS dissident with half a brain in his or her head knows that the lack of proof of purification of "HIV" is the central issue facing dissidents, and it's the Achilles heel of the AIDS industry.

It's high time that hypocrite and chicken shit Duesberg either "man-up", stop lying and ducking the issue of "HIV's" non-isolation, or retire from the dissident movement, his tail forever between his legs for repeatedly refusing to face facts about his stance on this crucial issue.

Farber and other diehard Duesberg cultists who are angry at the Perth Group for disassociating from the Rethinking AIDS group fail to realize that Duesberg has no one but himself to blame for this civil war that now exists between the two main factions of the AIDS dissident movement. The "virus challenge" originally issued by Continuum Magazine and the Perth Group in the mid 1990's was NEVER meant to be directed at Peter Duesberg. No one was forcing HIM to step forward and claim the reward for the missing virus. However, in an apparent and woefully inadequate effort to defend his life's work in the failed field of retrovirology, it was DUESBERG HIMSELF who purposefully CHOSE to submit a claim, thereby compelling the Perth Group to engage in a debate with HIM on the topic of the purported "isolation" of "HIV". However, obviously the true targets of the Continuum "virus challenge" campaign were orthodox "HIV" researchers like Gallo, Montagnier, Fauci, et al and NOT Duesberg. Only Duesberg knows his real motivations for trying to claim the "missing virus" reward. In doing so, Duesberg was either incredibly STUPID or he WANTED to divide the dissident movement.

If it was the latter, Duesberg certainly got his wish...

Continue to next message below for information on Duesberg's friend, conservative homophobe and Loch Ness Monster believer Henry Bauer (YAY! Just what the dissident movement needs- another conservative who hates homosexuals!):
27  AIDS Dissidents Exposed Blog / AIDS Dissidents Exposed Blog / Re: *UPDATED*-What the heck happened to the old forum and who is responsible for it? on: April 07, 2010, 09:02:18 AM

I am sorry that you were annoyed by your experiences on the old forum. One of the many facts which most of my dissident critics fail to acknowledge is that I DID INDEED have to endure input and, before I sacked all other moderators in the very last month that I had control of the forum, I also had to endure contradictory actions from the other moderators. In addition, of course, some of the other MEMBERS were constantly vocal about how they thought the forum should be, as if they possess the insight and in-depth knowledge of the dissident movement that I have. Another thing that many of my fellow dissidents who are constantly criticizing me fail to realize is that perhaps it's remotely possible that I simply do not want them to continue being public advocates for the cause. It never seems to occur to them that I find their posts so dismally void of intellectual rigor that I sometimes actually LAUGH when they say idiotic things like they "wouldn't be caught dead in (my) forum (this site)..."!

What a RELIEF!!

For this reason, I am really TIRED of venues which allow any Tom, Dick or Harry with an internet connection and a browsing history of 5 or 6 hours of reviewing dissident materials to state things as though they know what's best for all of AIDS dissidentdom.

As for the "team members" of the hijacked forum: first, I think that's a really dumb title. This isn't an athletic competition for Christ sake! It sounds like some dippy mid-level corporate sales manager's idea to inspire a weary "team" of salespeople. Also, although I am not a scholar of athletics, it is my guess that any "team" is only as strong as its weakest player. And THAT team (the RA contingent) has some REAL dummies on it!

That's also why I do not think "that those guys are paid by the medical industry". Certainly, anything is possible, but there honestly just doesn't seem to be enough intellectual luminescence emanating from any of these forum hijackers/twits to compete with a lighted matchstick!

As for the (self-appointed) "leaders" whom these dummies continue to embrace (Crowe, Duesberg, Farber, Bauer, etc...), ALL BETS ARE OFF. All of these "leaders" should (and probably DO) "know better". It is indeed tempting to wonder why THESE parties continue with their fatally flawed approach.

OH, and please do not be discouraged by any of these developments. It's about time these actions were taken. Instead of trying to figure out why these jerks behave the way they do, those of us who are literate, astute dissidents should continue working behind and in front of the scenes (as I assure you we have been) to rid the dissident movement of this albatross (the RA contingent) that has been around our collective necks for too long. The first necessary but not sufficient step in accomplishing this is to get everyone to clearly assert their alignment so we all know where everyone stands.

Rod Knoll,
"AIDS Dissidents EXPOSED"

28  AIDS Dissidents Exposed Blog / AIDS Dissidents Exposed Blog / Re: *UPDATED*-What the heck happened to the old forum and who is responsible for it on: April 05, 2010, 05:28:20 PM
At the risk of being accused of, in the words of stupid shit Brian Coogan, "attacking", "pulling down" and "tear(ing) down the one organization that is making a consistent effort", I should remind everyone that a lawsuit has just been filed against the President of the Rethinking AIDS Organization, David Crowe.

Last week, in Alberta, Canada, a lawsuit was filed against David Crowe and other former leaders of the Alberta (Canada) Green Party. For more details, please see this PRESS RELEASE.

For more information about the problems the Alberta Green Party has experienced before and after Crowe and the other former party leaders got ousted, please see:

One has to wonder how much longer clueless Coogan and his fellow forum hijackers/redneck dildos will continue "backing (RA) up" and "giving (RA) a go" while the RA board continues to allow someone like Crowe to be their leader??? I wonder, too, if forum hijacker Lance still finds all of our "infighting...just so goddamn tedious" in light of this most recent development? In addition, does the ever insightful hijacker Carter still believe this to be a "perceived flaw" of Crowe's or has it now at long last become an actual flaw of Crowe's in Carter's "razor-sharp" mind? Quite frankly, Carter's writing style has led me to believe that he might have a developmental disability. Also, is the equally dim-witted hijacker Barnett at long last "able to follow a discussion about" this particular issue, and is he still convinced that "the problem that glares at (him) when reading about" our criticisms of RA and Crowe ("EGO") still applies to "both sides" of this dissident civil war??
29  AIDS Dissidents Exposed Blog / AIDS Dissidents Exposed Blog / RA Grand poobah and habitual LIAR David Crowe gets SUED, then tries blackmail on: April 04, 2010, 07:50:56 PM
Last week, in Alberta, Canada, a lawsuit was filed against David Crowe and other former leaders of the Alberta (Canada) Green Party. For more details, please see this PRESS RELEASE.

For more information about the problems the Alberta Green Party has experienced before and after Crowe and the other former party leaders got ousted, please see:
30  AIDS Dissidents Exposed Blog / AIDS Dissidents Exposed Blog / Why are Brink & Knoll so critical of fellow dissidents not aligned with Perth? on: March 28, 2010, 03:18:39 PM
If anyone feels that my postings on this site have been "hateful" (see, for example, I think the following explanation from Anthony Brink also helps to explain why I've exhibited anger in my writing lately:

"Of course it's all very sad...and everyone loves to wring their hands together and say how very sad it is, because indeed everyone's always wringing their hands together and saying how very sad it is, since it’s always sad when families break up, and we all like to think of ourselves as a big family; but in my view the intelligent, responsible thing to do after drying our eyes is sit up smartly and ask the hard question: how and why did it happen that the universally acknowledged scientific leaders of our movement -- who've attacked the 'HIV' theory of AIDS from the beginning, before anyone else, most radically, most comprehensively and, as the Parenzee case revealed, unanswerably -- dissociated themselves from (Rethinking AIDS), whose original incarnation in 1991 their principal scientist Eleni Papadopulos-Eleopulos co-founded and even lent its name: 'The Group for the Scientific Reappraisal of the HIV-AIDS Hypothesis'?

The enquiry into our enormous problems and their causes may excavate some unpleasant discoveries, but ours is not a suburban book club gathering where smiling all the time keeps it working, it's a struggle to advance in the most effective manner possible the truth we've discovered about an enormous medical mistake and rotten political construct causing tremendous harm.

The process will necessarily entail the graceful retirement of those who come off bested in the debates.

It goes without saying that anyone who is shown to have acted in a dishonest, grossly inept and harmful manner will be among the first to leave the field. Since obviously we can't have anyone dishonest, grossly inept and harmful to our work anywhere near the public face of our movement...."

(Excerpted from )

I've also had a really bad case of hemorrhoids for years, but that's another issue...

Rod Knoll,
"Rethinking AIDS" Exposed



(click here to view a list of all discussions)
Pages: 1 [2] 3
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.13 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!