AIDS Dissidents Exposed Blog
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
October 20, 2016, 07:32:28 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
48 Posts in 31 Topics by 191 Members
Latest Member: oakleya18
* Home Help Login Register
+  AIDS Dissidents Exposed Blog
|-+  AIDS Dissidents Exposed Blog
| |-+  AIDS Dissidents Exposed Blog
| | |-+  The Perth Group yet again on the embarrassing, unnecessary "endogenous RV" crap
0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic. « previous next »
Pages: [1] Print
Author Topic: The Perth Group yet again on the embarrassing, unnecessary "endogenous RV" crap  (Read 5372 times)
Rod Knoll, blogger
Sr. Member
Posts: 45

See my signature and custom title information.

« on: April 25, 2013, 11:03:00 AM »

There are more than two competing hypotheses in the dissident movement. Every scientifically literate dissident is painfully aware of Peter Duesberg's long-standing claim that "HIV" is a "harmless passenger virus". Of course, his theory has been rebutted so often and so thoroughly that it has come to resemble a proverbial party guest who has stayed way too long after the party has ended. However, there is one more completely unnecessary and completely WRONG retroviral-centered theory which has been around for a few years and has at least a few obviously short-sighted and anti-scientific admirers within the AIDS dissident community.

The Perth Group have issued yet another rebuttal to all of these retrovirus-theory partisans in which the Perth Group briefly review the work they've published on exogenous retroviruses. The main thrust of the Perth Group's latest document is, however, yet another rebuttal which unfortunately still needs to be stated-of the thoroughly embarrassing, completely unnecessary and unfounded hypothesis that "HIV" is an endogenous retrovirus and that ERVs are involved in the pathogenesis of "AIDS".

The Perth Group's article is available at the following link:

Sometimes I wonder if some dissidents who oppose Duesberg have an "anyone but the Perth Group" mentality?? Why else would said dissidents feel the need to support these embarrassing, unnecessary and completely stupid tertiary hypotheses???

« Last Edit: June 15, 2013, 10:41:40 AM by Rod Knoll, blogger, "Rethinking AIDS" Exposed » Logged

Rod Knoll has been an AIDS dissident since 1995 and a long-time supporter of the Perth Group ( Rod is now exclusively focusing on exposing the damage done by other groups of AIDS dissidents. Rod's history as a dissident is at: (click link)
Pages: [1] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.13 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!